Frustration and Conflict Of Motives

Wikipedia.com, Psycnet.apa.org

Frustration is a common emotional response to opposition. Related to anger and disappointment, it arises from the perceived resistance to the fulfillment of individual will. The greater the obstruction, and the greater the will, the more the frustration is likely to be. Causes of frustration may be internal or external. In people, internal frustration may arise from challenges in fulfilling personal goals and desires, instinctual drives and needs, or dealing with perceived deficiencies, such as a lack of confidence or fear of social situations. Conflict can also be an internal source of frustration; when one has competing goals that interfere with one another, it can create cognitive dissonance. External causes of frustration involve conditions outside an individual, such as a blocked road or a difficult task. While coping with frustration, some individuals may engage in passive-aggressive behavior, making it difficult to identify the original cause(s) of their frustration, as the responses are indirect. A more direct, and common response, is a propensity towards aggression.

Causes

To the individual experiencing frustration, the emotion is usually attributed to external factors which are beyond their control. Although mild frustration due to internal factors (e.g. laziness, lack of effort) is often a positive force (inspiring motivation), it is more often than not a perceived uncontrolled problem that instigates more severe, and perhaps pathological, frustration. An individual suffering from pathological frustration will often feel powerless to change the situation they are in, leading to frustration and, if left uncontrolled, further anger.

Frustration can be a result of blocking motivated behavior. An individual may react in several different ways. He/She may respond with rational problem-solving methods to overcome the barrier. Failing in this, he/she may become frustrated and behave irrationally. An example of blockage of motivational energy would be the case of a worker who wants time off to go fishing but is denied permission by his/her supervisor. Another example would be the executive who wants a promotion but finds he/she lacks certain qualifications. If, in these cases, an appeal to reason does not succeed in reducing the barrier or in developing some reasonable alternative approach, the frustrated individual may resort to less adaptive methods of trying to reach the goal. He/She may, for example, attack the barrier physically or verbally or both.

 Symptoms

Frustration can be considered a problem-response behavior, and can have a number of effects, depending on the mental health of the individual. In positive cases, this frustration will build until a level that is too great for the individual to contend with, and thus produce action directed at solving the inherent problem. In negative cases, however, the individual may perceive the source of frustration to be outside of their control, and thus the frustration will continue to build, leading eventually to further problematic behavior (e.g. violent reaction).

Stubborn refusal to respond to new conditions affecting the goal, such as removal or modification of the barrier, sometimes occurs. As pointed out by Brown, severe punishment may cause individuals to continue nonadaptive behavior blindly: “Either it may have an effect opposite to that of reward and as such, discourage the repetition of the act, or, by functioning as a frustrating agent, it may lead to fixation and the other symptoms of frustration as well. It follows that punishment is a dangerous tool, since it often has effects which are entirely the opposite of those desired”.

Conflict Of Motives

When two states of feeling, viewed merely as emotions, come together, if they are of the same nature, we have a sum total--as when the occurrence of two pleasures gives a greater pleasure. When a pain concurs with a pleasure, we find as a matter of fact that the one can neutralize the other. All through life we apply the grateful to submerge the disagreeable. This is one phase of the opposition of the two cardinal states of our consciousness. Each of them has a distinct substantive existence, like black and white. There are opposites that have merely a formal existence, as plus and minus in Algebra; but the state of pain would be a genuine fact, although there were no state of pleasure at all; in which case the opposition would simply be suffering and the absence of suffering. It is true, but only as a matter of observation, and not as a matter of foregone necessity, that the remission or cessation of a pained condition yields a pleasure, which we can accept as an element of our happiness no less than when affected with an impression of a pleasurable origin. In the same manner, when we are under delight, a check or suspension operates upon the mind like a positive infliction from the beginning, so that out of pleasure springs pain, and the contrary. Nevertheless we must regard the two modes of mind as each of a positive and independent character, although possessing those relationships of mutual opposition. In the conflict of the two, therefore, one will be lost and the other lowered in its efficacy; the first being pronounced the weaker, and the second the stronger.